As a Utahn, I get pretty damn tired of the jam job.
I'm sure I speak for the rest of the blm states.
Wind turbines at sea get shot down because the Kerry's and Kennedys didn't like the view, but jam this crap down the throats of the west.
My contention is that if development of public land is bad, then it's bad. Is development better because Stone -Manning proposes it rather than Pendley.?
The deafening silence from the mothership of your group is pretty deafening
Imagine if the BLM announced 22 million acres for oil/gas, mining, timber.
There wouldn't be enough craft beer in the country to feed the thirst of the usual suspects and their loud objections.
Are we putting an asterisk on "public land in public hands" now based on team jerseys?
I've never understood the point. I've run a Buck 112 since I was 10. Hundreds of fish, birds, deer, elk, a few sheep(domestic, my odds suck), a few half beef.
You guys must have robotic hands,because on a big animal, I get the hand cramps, and don't mind a minute break in cutting to run it on...
The instafamous hunting celebrities and you tube experts deserve a big share of the blame, but I'll let Matt Rinella smack them.
What doesn't get discussed enough, is tge perception created by the newer fad of "conservation tags" The public doesn't support trophy hunting. Imagine how much...
It is an interesting year. Scouting deer this weekend several normally travel able roads in UT still have snow drifts across them that will be there still this winter. Water coming out of springs dry for years. Green grass. In Aug.
And yet, fire season is here. Strange year indeed
Great thing is this too shall pass in the US and the remnants will end up in Wyoming.
10 years from now you won't be able to pick up a lot lizard or smoke meth in Wyoming without some 'Merica vipers.
Its interesting how when cases go against a side, Roe being the prime example, they work within the parameters to change the makeup.
The other side, just decides to do what the hell they want, and have no loyalty to any rule or tradition. Biden packs the courts, the next R will do the same...
So, when I read threads about different politicians in here, or different people, it's safe to assume the OP has sought answers before posting?
Did you ask the OP he had prior to posting?
Not looking to beef, but as a newer guy, I was kinda shocked at the accusations hurled in one direction...
Is the new rule here that one must have reached out to an individual or group first before discussing or criticizing them?
I'm pretty new here, but if that's the rule, sure seems like there will be very little to talk about here.
Or is that just the rule for topics that cut against the grain...