Search results
-
P
CPW director on leave after complaint of racist comment
https://www.gjsentinel.com/news/western_colorado/report-preceding-prenzlows-retirement-questioned-his-continued-ability-to-lead/article_53e1c34a-603b-11ed-9a92-c73de248dac2.html -
P
Divorce, do you ever see it coming...
- Pelican
- Post #293
- Forum: Fireside (A Place for Friends)
-
P
Divorce, do you ever see it coming...
I guess I’m going to join a a club nobody wants to be in.- Pelican
- Post #291
- Forum: Fireside (A Place for Friends)
-
P
Fish ID challenge
Colorado does stock splake. Female brook trout tend to have washed out colors vs. males, particularly in clear water. They get more colorful as they get closer to spawning.- Pelican
- Post #24
- Forum: Fishing Hole
-
P
Fish ID challenge
Brook trout. Splake have more of a forked tail.- Pelican
- Post #20
- Forum: Fishing Hole
-
P
CPW seeks public feedback on big game hunting license distribution
Great. So the commission could raise application fees for all by $3 per species and cover the predicted $2.2 million loss in revenue to CPW if going to 80:20 without any need for the general assembly. -
P
CPW seeks public feedback on big game hunting license distribution
@Oak Do you know if the commission has the authority to raise application fees or add a PP fee for deer, elk, pronghorn? If so, they could increase revenue beyond CPI without having to go through the general assembly. I thought the commission added the $50-$100 PP fee for MSG but am not sure. -
P
CPW seeks public feedback on big game hunting license distribution
80:20 would go a long way to address point creep for residents😄. Proposing to require the use of PP for all list A deer and list A pronghorn licenses would fix a lot of the point creep problem and still allow CPW to sell most of the crap that are generally elk licenses. -
P
CPW seeks public feedback on big game hunting license distribution
I mostly agree. The benefit I see to pushing off the OTC discussion is that it gives us time to try and get a cap on both NR archery and NR rifle OTC with the caveat that all NR OTC tags need to be applied for in the draw. I think most outfitted clients would have already sent a deposit by the... -
P
CPW seeks public feedback on big game hunting license distribution
https://cpw.state.co.us/Documents/Commission/2022/September/Item.21a-MEMO_License_distribution_problems_and_alternatives_Sept_PWC_FINAL_08252022_w_appendix.pdf -
P
CPW seeks public feedback on big game hunting license distribution
I may be misinterpreting your post but currently in CO you only use/loss your points if you draw your first choice. Many of the hunt codes that require double digit points for a NR to draw are already under a 80:20 split. -
P
CPW seeks public feedback on big game hunting license distribution
Your ignorance and hostile attitude toward resident hunters should make you an excellent candidate for the CPW commission. You should apply and fix this from the inside! #grateful -
P
CPW seeks public feedback on big game hunting license distribution
The reason this hasn’t already occurred is because CPW knows that it would result in thousands of crappy tags going unsold. In Colorado, effective solutions to problems are dismissed if they result in any loss of revenue to CPW and why point banking and point averaging are going to be proposed... -
P
CPW seeks public feedback on big game hunting license distribution
The numbers are from the financial update spreadsheets CPW provides to the commission during the September meeting each year. https://cpw.state.co.us/aboutus/Pages/CommissionMeetings.aspx Scroll down to each year, click on the sept meeting, scroll down to PowerPoint, financial update. I... -
P
CPW seeks public feedback on big game hunting license distribution
I think we should have a minimum of 80:20 for limited units. I agree that capping OTC or making OTC tags only available in the draw are both great ideas and would support it for both R and NR as this would atleast avoid any future increase in hunter numbers. Capping OTC tag numbers at a number... -
P
CPW seeks public feedback on big game hunting license distribution
I disagree. It has been over a decade since there has been serious discussion regarding allocation and it only got this far due to the treat of legislation. If we don’t get a statewide adjustment this time around, we may never get another opportunity. CPW/COA are very effective at putting up... -
P
CPW seeks public feedback on big game hunting license distribution
In FY 17-18 when the Future Generations Act was passed by the legislature, wildlife related revenue was 136 million. The justification for passing the act was that CPW predicted a 30 million dollar deficit by 2025 for the wildlife portion of CPW. In FY 18-19 wildlife related revenue increased... -
P
CO leftover list is available
- Pelican
- Post #398
- Forum: Tag, Applications, Maps & E-Scouting
-
P
CPW seeks public feedback on big game hunting license distribution
If anyone is so inclined, comments need to be submitted by noon on Friday for the comment to be provided to the commission prior to the meeting.
