I'm a little ashamed of it, but I left my kids out. This past week we taught them how to to do a "perfect" push-up, sit-up, and crunch. Think it did everyone involved a lot of good.
This was really good information. It just really bothered me that a publication like this came up so short-sighted. Especially with an audience that might be (almost) entirely composed of non-hunters.
In the mean time; I wish CO the best in keeping these things out.
Yes. I was up there today and passed a group watching a color phase black bear. I didn't stop to talk, but am sure that it was easily mistaken for a grizzly by at least a few. I had to do a double take myself.
A few come to mind. But, I suppose the top three are:
1. Why exactly is THIS herd healthier NOW?
2. Since when did Colorado have an elk problem?
3. Why are wolves viewed as the best solution?
Thanks for the feedback.
A few points didn't quite add up in this piece, but maybe some of you biologists out there can clue me in?
https://api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/animals/2020/07/yellowstone-wolves-reintroduction-helped-stabilize-ecosystem
I disagree. I think that it should be kept as it is, for now. Only, revise with an extra one or two tags to give Non-residents a crack at it. But, a $10 fee for Non-residents is a pipe dream.
Understanding that you don't NEED it or "have to have it" is the first step; finding value beyond the object/experience is more valuable than the money itself. Nevermind what it might have purchased.
I used to run into these fat-assed slugs from alabama, Michigan, etc. who told me that they "hunted" elk. It took years for my stupid arse to realise that they were writing checks to pull triggers.