Search results

  1. S

    Armed Threats on Bison?

    Buzz, it looks like BigRack's gonna exercise his right to remain silent on this one. He's a quick learner, he his.
  2. S

    Armed Threats on Bison?

    Even that old posse comitatus tightwad Bundy paid a buck thirty five for awhile.
  3. S

    Armed Threats on Bison?

    Don't forget about the 5th. No shame in evoking it.;)
  4. S

    Armed Threats on Bison?

    Not sure I'm following your logic. Are you saying that we shouldn't protect what's left of our wild places?
  5. S

    Armed Threats on Bison?

    All the more reason to protect whats left of our wild places.
  6. S

    Armed Threats on Bison?

    I don't blame you. If I had been caught talking out of my a$$ I'd plead the 5th too.;)
  7. S

    Armed Threats on Bison?

    Once again. YOU are the one who brought up the Constitution. How does it pertain to this conversation about wildlife and personal property as you see it?
  8. S

    Armed Threats on Bison?

    You referenced the Constitution,in a discussion about wildlife and personal property. I thought you might like the chance to fill us in on your opinions on the subject.
  9. S

    Armed Threats on Bison?

    I'm waiting on my lesson on ''Constitutional law'',as it pertains to wildlife.
  10. S

    Armed Threats on Bison?

    Please do tell.
  11. S

    New to CO, archery or first rifle?

    This.
  12. S

    Breaking news! Bundy Ranch real information.

    You might want to try and lock this thread too.;)
  13. S

    Uncle Ted on Fair Chase

    You've been around long enough to know, this post needed a photo...................Come on man!
  14. S

    BLM, Forest Service and Nevada Ranchers

    BR in post 373 you answered'' yes'' ranchers should pay to use public land. Why then do you bemoan the fact that Randy would have to pay a fee to use the same ground in an effort to make a profit?
  15. S

    BLM, Forest Service and Nevada Ranchers

    Your words not mine. You seem to be laboring under the illusion that the''He'' in your statement is somehow getting the screws put to him because ''He's'' being forced to pay twice for the consumption of a resources that we all own.
  16. S

    BLM, Forest Service and Nevada Ranchers

    Well actually he didn't . All he actually paid was 1 part out of around 309 million (compulsory). The second time he didn't pay ANYTHING(Fees). See how that works.;)
  17. S

    BLM, Forest Service and Nevada Ranchers

    This is a pretty cool analogy you dug up right here. Stay with me now. As a non consumptive user it doesn't cost a dime to go to Mt Rushmore,not one cent. If you do go and decide to become a consumer it will cost you some extra ''Fees''. If you chose to use the fancy covered parking structure...
  18. S

    BLM, Forest Service and Nevada Ranchers

    I'm done with you. SS will have an honest debate with you but if you keep trying to be cute he'll chew you up and spit you out. Best of luck to you.
  19. S

    BLM, Forest Service and Nevada Ranchers

    ...
  20. S

    BLM, Forest Service and Nevada Ranchers

    ...
Gastro Gnome - Eat Better Wherever

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
113,669
Messages
2,029,040
Members
36,276
Latest member
Eller fam

Share this page

Back
Top