I don’t think that’s the case. At some point you’ve got to hold a line and not just fold.
However, let’s get this back on track of the actual proposal.
I don’t disagree with you. I’m just wondering if everyone puts all this faith in Wyoming’s season structure as the answer to Montana’s problems but in reality it may be an apples to oranges comparison if they have half the hunters. Taking the season out of the rut should allow some deer to grow...
Has anyone compared Wyoming’s Hunter numbers to Montana’s? I know it’s a popular opinion that Wyoming has better deer hunting because of their seasons, but is that the only variable?
It seems accurate to me. For the most part the Feds do a fairly shitty job of managing the land. A lot of it has to do with them being under funded and a lot of it has to do with all the red tape around their policies.
It’s also very tough to please people because everyone wants something...
That’s some serious gymnastics. Every person that understands biology will tell you that you don’t manage populations with buck/bull harvest. As long as there are enough males to breed every female then populations are directly related to doe/cow populations. Sure…you can have a tiny percent...
I can’t think of a single unit that went LE and then back to general. Other than one unit that has high prevalence of cwd and it took one year for it to go right back to garbage.