I walked the property I hunt yesterday in Porter county and was blown away at the lack of any sort of deer sign. It’s 112 acre woods surrounded by fields and woods and is typically loaded with deer. I spent 2 hours walking it and did not turn up a single scrape or rub anywhere on the property...
It was a 3 x 9. What I liked about it the most was it just seemed like it was easier to pick up the target. I’m assuming with the bigger lens is it had a bigger field of view.
I posted this thread in the firearms section instead of the optics figuring it might get more views. I admit I’m not very knowledgeable about rifles and scopes but am wondering what the advantages or disadvantages are to having a 50mm vs a 40 mm lens scope? I currently have a Leupold vx-3 HD...
I always used 3” Remington magnum copper solid slugs out of my 12g 870. My god that is a miserable gun at the range. I would shoot a box of 5 every year before season started to verify it was sighted in. I hated every shot. Extremely deadly combo though.
I also had some luck turning up elk by side hilling the dark timber mid day into the wind on a very windy day. Moving slow and glassing through the timber to try and spot something. I’m sure there are parts of the unit that are really good for glassing, just not the area I was in.